Design & Mainstream Culture
---------------------------------设计与主流文化
Ultimately, who cares? Avid appreciation brings up images of hordes of teenagers hanging out in the mere hope that they'll see you, let alone get your autograph, picture, or some other thrilling memento to remind them of their brush with fame. I'm not so sure that avid appreciation is something worthwhile to aim for...I'm much more keener on the idea that people who build the web will be able to make a living building sites where cash isn't the only driving force behind its existence.
The niche community that designers have will expand to incorporate mainstream culture - we're already seeing this happen in the form of design portals. There's a huge community out there, and at a guess there's a large quantity of people who are simply into design and not working as or aiming to work as a commercial artist.
We can very safely leave my mother out of the equation when it comes to knowing about webdesigners. The olds rarely have access to the web and daily papers, which are the main sources of general interest stories about designers which are aimed at a more mainstream market. Two thirds of the worlds population will die not having touched a computer. Count yourself lucky.
Younger people tend to be more likely to know their stuff when it comes to the web and designers. 15 year olds email Scott (http://www.pixelshifter.net) wanting to know how to become a famous designer just like him now that he's scored a Macromedia site of the day. Frances Cobain told her mom that she was keen on being a webdesigner. Kids are going to have a greater knowledge about the web and web design in general, because they grew up with it, and it's a part of their life.
I don't think that we're going to see designers being targeted to the mainstream in the same way that Britney is - thank goodness. However, might someone in the design world do a deal with Apple to produce ads about themselves aimed at designers which become popular, and are then delivered to a more mainstream market? It's going to be interesting to see what happens in the future with media making becoming more accessible to designers.
What is happening, and what I hope to see more of is one niche being picked up by another. Going to my flatmates end of architecture course showing, the amount of final works that looked like printouts of Mike Young's stuff was insane. Did they know about him? If the web and what designers are doing was part of the curriculum, architectural students might have further developed and extended their work, and had a greater understanding and appreciation of designers. It's great to see sites like archinect (http://www.archinect.com/) crossing boundaries of disiplines such as web design and architecture.
Traditional artists would probably get a kick out of seeing what James Patterson, Vicki Wong and Lee Meisenheimer have done with drawing online, and stretching the methods and mediums of how their own work is created and displayed. It's often frustrating trying to find new content to post at artkrush - galleries and artists have yet to see the benefits of coming online, so that awesome local show that you wanted to write about? No go. I'd love to see more collaborations and traditional based art brought online, and what happens when new/old media artists work together.
So, that avid mainstream appreciation? It ain't gonna happen for people whose main work is web based, because the web is still very much a niche, albeit a rapidly expanding one. Hopefully sooner than later, it will be possible for people involved with the web to create a living by having greater recognition of the independent work that they do. At least, here's hoping, because it would sure beat the hell out of looking, acting, and sounding like plastic for the enjoyment of the masses.
ORION TATE freshjuicy.com heavy.com
No, my mom will never know what James Patterson or Jemma Gura look like in the same way that she knows what Britney Spears or Kurt Cobain look like, unless either of them sell a million records or secure a lucrative Pepsi endorsement. Though this really is just a question of degrees: *avid* appreciation of graphic designers has always been and I suspect will continue to be limited to a relatively niche audience. That being said, there does seem to be an increased consumer appreciation for that which is designed and, as a result, increased media attention on designers. The may issue of Paper Magazine, for example, features a discussion on the design principles of Target ("Yay, Tar-Jay!") and an interview with Apple design guru, Jonathan Ive, both articles loosely themed around the topic "ordinary design and corporate branding through aesthetics."
In the introduction to the section "Extra Ordinary Design," editor Kim Hastreiter, appropriately invoking the memory of Andy Warhol, touches on two topics relevant to this discussion: our aesthetic zeitgeist and the Designer-Rockstar:
"I think he [Andy Warhol] really would have appreciated this whole "Target moment" we are experiencing. His heart would be racing as fast as mine does as I mentally prepare for the day this June when I'll get to purchase my Stephen Sprouse designed boogie board, skateboard, flip-flops and beach towel...I can't wait to see what Target has done not only with Stephen Sprouse, but also with designers Todd Oldham, Marc Ecko and Philippe Starck."
Hastreiter, goes on to explain that Target "shrouds the creative folks of their corporate culture in mystery, preferring to keep the world's eye on the merchandise, not the hype or the names." This suggests, that while the author, a self-described design freak, wants to know who designs the packaging and products, the general public need not be concerned. This is a successful strategy for Target and suggests an interesting trend: as design proliferates, which it will continue to do in this age of hyper-information, it becomes increasingly integrated into our lives to a point where good design is implicitly appreciated, but perhaps not explicitly celebrated.
